History, Blasphemy, and Russia

simplyorthodox:

image

A great article by Frederica Mathewes-Green on the “Pussy Riot” protesters. I usually don’t post this type of articles in my blog, but this one is worth reading. 

When the “Pussy Riot” protesters were sentenced last week for their performance in Christ the Savior Cathedral in Moscow, a friend asked me why Orthodox Christians were so upset about what they’d done. For him, this was clearly a political protest. It was aimed at a too-close entwining of church and state, so it took place in a church. What’s the big deal?

But, in practice, there’s a difference. If you protest at a government building, you impact people in that government. If you protest at a business, you impact people in that business. But when you protest at a church, you don’t hit only those in power. You hit all the ordinary people, too, the ones who don’t have any influence or power. They come to church on a weekday afternoon just to pray, because they’re worried or sad about something. When someone mocks their faith it wounds them. It wounds their fellow-believers all over the world, who have no connection at all to the target of the protest.

What caused this pain was that the women sang a song that contained obscenities and a parody of a prayer. Those on the outside might not get why it was so hurtful. Well, for one thing, the altar in an Orthodox church is felt to be especially holy; it’s not like the stage of a church auditorium. Because Christianity grew out of Judaism, the altar is like the Holy of Holies in the ancient Temple.

But the form of the protest, a mocking and obscene prayer, also hit on particular, and painful, memories. My spiritual father, Fr. George Calciu, spent 21 years in communist prison. (He died in 2006). He was subjected to the brainwashing process, and they used both physical and emotional torture. They mocked everything and everyone he loved—his wife, his child, his faith. A centerpiece of the brainwashing program was to subject prisoners to parody church services, with obscene and mocking prayers.

All Christian prisoners endured this abuse. Millions of clergy, monastics, and lay people died for their beliefs. Fr. George survived, and, thanks to the efforts of Romanian expatriates like Eugene Ionescu and Mircea Eliade, he was freed in 1984.

It’s not that long ago.

The problem was the mockery of our prayers, not the protest against Putin and the official church. There are many Christians who share these women’s concerns, and our faith has a long history of prayer for deliverance from unjust rulers. A sincere prayer might have had an entirely different effect; it might have attracted allies everywhere. Sincerity is always better than mockery.

Also, the church where this happened has a sensitive history. The original Christ the Savior Cathedral was built in the 19th century, modeled on the finest Byzantine architecture and filled with treasures of art and iconography. In 1931, the Soviets destroyed it—they blew it up. You can see the footage online. Artworks were thrown in a pile and burned—destroyed specifically because of their religious content, like the Buddha statues dynamited in Afghanistan.

But in the 1990’s there grew up a popular movement to rebuild the Cathedral. A million citizens of Moscow donated to the fund. The new cathedral is identical to the one that was destroyed. So this church has a significant story: it was destroyed by the powerful, and rebuilt by the people.

The new cathedral was consecrated in 2000. It’s not that long ago.

What’s the right punishment in such a case? We could try picturing analogous incidents, imagining protesters invading a mosque or a synagogue and chanting obscene parodies of the worshippers’ prayers. But I don’t know that there’s a need for punishment. Community service would be better. These women could use their talents to gather and tell the stories of those who lived through the bad times, and the stories of those who did not make it through. That would be something we could all agree on—a project that could bring healing and understanding, and strengthen memory against future abuse.

When you’re young and strong, like these women are, it can be hard to imagine that anyone was ever weak, or suffering, or persecuted, or afraid. You might think, “It can’t happen here.” But it did happen—right there. And not that long ago. We know this from history: if you forget the times when the faithful were mocked with abusive and obscene words, it won’t be long before we’re hearing those words again.

(Source: frederica.com)

Russia’s Little Girls

“The Moscow Girls’ Cadet Boarding School is one of the new elite military academies in Russia. While most kids hate school for boring maths or history, the classes here include stripping down an AK-47 Kalashnikov rifle. And the girls can do it in the time it takes most kids to send an SMS. With a curriculum that includes drill, arms, first aid and federal law, one might expect it to turn into little Amazons. But femininity is also highly valued, so the evenings are reserved for such activities as sewing, ballet and compulsory choir practice. There are no mini-skirts and swear words, no smoking and drinking, and no hanging about unattended. Mobile phones are also banned except for a few minutes a day to talk with parents. A traditional Russian Winter Ball gives the girls a rare chance to meet the opposite sex, in this case from a nearby all-male boarding school boarding school called Moscow Cossacks Cadet Corps - another military-style academy founded during the Putin years.”

Now this is an educational reform I’d like to see in Australia. Unlike the seminaries for socialism that you see here.

(Source: gunrunnerhell, via blackpignotebook)

lostsplendor:

A German Airship Lands, 1930 (via English Russia)

On September 10th, 1930 the airship reached Moscow, circled above the city for two hours and landed on Khodynka Field. Over 3,000 viewers could watch the landing. The airship had 42 crew members, 23 passengers and 21 kg of mail aboard. It took the airship about 26 hours to cover the distance of 2,372 m.
themauveroom:

Alix and her Scottie dog: 1900. According to Anna Vyrubova, it was a very unpleasant creature that was always nipping at everyone’s ankles. (I can’t currently remember or find his name.)

themauveroom:

Alix and her Scottie dog: 1900. According to Anna Vyrubova, it was a very unpleasant creature that was always nipping at everyone’s ankles. (I can’t currently remember or find his name.)

"I prefer to be hated for a rightful cause than loved for a wrong one."

— Tsar Paul (Pavel) I of Russia (via beautynorder)

(via cercleproudhon)

tiny-librarian:

This coronation portrait of Catherine the Great (1729–1796) combines the traditions of formal imperial portraiture of the first half of the 18th century with its characteristic grandeur and presentational image, and the new tendencies which arose under the influence of the New Age. In Russian culture the ideal of an enlightened monarch was forming. Seated on the throne, Catherine II makes a gesture of majestic grace as she seems to address an unseen interlocutor. This gives the image of the Empress liveliness and a slight nuance of intimacy. However the tsarist rank of the Sovereign, her profile which resembles a cameo from Antiquity, her lavish dress, and the precise “enumeration” in the portrait of the tsarist regalia, as well as the massive base of the column and heavy drapery all form a festive and impressive composition which lends to the image of the heroine an ideal, timeless character. Catherine the Great considered this portrait one of the most successful among the many depictions of her.

Portrait of Catherine II by Fedor Stepanovich Rokotov (1763)

tiny-librarian:

This coronation portrait of Catherine the Great (1729–1796) combines the traditions of formal imperial portraiture of the first half of the 18th century with its characteristic grandeur and presentational image, and the new tendencies which arose under the influence of the New Age. In Russian culture the ideal of an enlightened monarch was forming. Seated on the throne, Catherine II makes a gesture of majestic grace as she seems to address an unseen interlocutor. This gives the image of the Empress liveliness and a slight nuance of intimacy. However the tsarist rank of the Sovereign, her profile which resembles a cameo from Antiquity, her lavish dress, and the precise “enumeration” in the portrait of the tsarist regalia, as well as the massive base of the column and heavy drapery all form a festive and impressive composition which lends to the image of the heroine an ideal, timeless character. Catherine the Great considered this portrait one of the most successful among the many depictions of her.

Portrait of Catherine II by Fedor Stepanovich Rokotov (1763)

glukauf:

Ленинградский Дом моделей одежды, 1977.

glukauf:

Ленинградский Дом моделей одежды, 1977.

(via khrushchev-is-my-homeboy)

carolathhabsburg:

Pss Alix of Hesse and father, Ludwig. Late 1880s.

carolathhabsburg:

Pss Alix of Hesse and father, Ludwig. Late 1880s.

(via royal-world-deactivated20130322)

zerogate:

‘Russian Amish’: Children of the schism (RT documentary)

They lead a quiet life out of public view and keep distant from worldly matters. Religious books written in the Old Slavonic language are studied and food is all homemade. Married women are obliged to cover their head, while men have beards. The length of their dresses, trousers and shirt sleeves is strictly regimented - most of the body is covered. Living, eating or praying together with lay people is out of the question. They are the Old Believers.

legrandcirque:

Vasily Dosekin, Russia, ca. 1880.

legrandcirque:

Vasily Dosekin, Russia, ca. 1880.